liveonearth: (Default)
 
 
I've been excited since I learned of the recent merger of non-partisan orgs that created the Forward Party in the U.S., and I created google alerts so I could track what was being said about it.  Since that day I have read a host of naysaying pundits explaining all the reasons that a third party "can't work".  I've also encountered serious skepticism and fear among my friends and acquaintances when we discuss it in person.

What people don't seem to know is the goals of the Forward Party.  The platform on the website is admittedly vague, and this is because the Forward Party is made up of Independents, Republicans and Democrats who agree on one thing: the current two-party system is driving us into a hole, and we have to fix our institutions in order to pull ourselves out of it.  The goal: Fix Our Institutions, starting with Elections.

So, what can we do that will change the direction of this failing democracy?  WE CAN FIX OUR ELECTIONS by bringing these three issues to the top of our priority list and acting on them.  If we can fix our elections, we might be able to pull our Anocracy back toward Democracy.

1. Ranked Choice Voting.  There are lots of other ways to vote but this one keeps rising to the top because it allows us to select our favorite candidate, and our second and third favorite, on down the line.  Every vote counts because if your first choice doesn't get enough votes, your second choice is counted.  In this way we avoid the current problem of having to vote for the "lesser of two evils" in order to avoid the "spoiler effect" that can occur if we vote for a 3rd party candidate.  Basically RCV (Ranked Choice Voting) will make it POSSIBLE for candidates from any party to win office if they are good enough.  But this doesn't work alone.

2. Open Primaries.  This means that everybody can vote for any party candidate in the primaries.  You will not be banned from voting in any primaries because of which party you registered with.  I'm not sure but it might become unnecessary to specify which party you belong to in order to vote.  That would be a blessing, because I find myself switching my party affiliation with some regularity in order to support candidates that I like.  I am as independent as they come, and I don't appreciate having to declare a bogus party affiliation in order to support a candidate who is part of a party.  Anyway, in some states it's just a matter of a referendum on the ballot and voters can open the primaries.  In other states, like where I live, it requires a state constitutional amendment.  Open Primaries will further ensure that good candidates from any source can rise to the top.

3. Nonpartisan Districting.  I just learned that in Tennessee the Republicans have redistricted away the last Democrat Congressional seat, the one in Nashville.  They rearranged the lines to split up Nashville Dems so that a Republican can win that seat, and will.  I'm from Tennessee.  This partisan redistricting is a crime against our nation.  I live in Oregon which is districted in favor of the Democrats.  Both parties do this, and neither should be able to.  We must pass a law that creates non-partisan districting commissions.  This change must be nationwide.  We could redistrict based on plain old geography and population.  A computer program could do it.  This would mean that minorities in any state would still have a voice, and support the process of democracy.  IT WOULD BE FAIR.  The current system allows whoever is in charge to increase their power and you know what follows absolute power--->absolute corruption.  It is happening before our eyes.

I admit, these reforms WILL BE OPPOSED by both dominant parties.  They WILL BE OPPOSED by all the major news outlets.  This is because both parties and the news are hyper-partisan.  They have boatloads of money in the game, and they will loose money if their side starts losing elections. 

That is why WE THE PEOPLE must stand up to the money and power and make these changes.  Without these changes we will not be able to change anything else.  Wars, famine, unfair taxation, disinformation and disease will be our lot.  The powerful do not willingly relinquish power, they must be removed.  We must remove them.  These changes will benefit the people, and American government is supposed to be BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE.  Not by the money, for the money.

If this American experiment ever held sway in your heart, then you know what is at stake.
 
 
 
 
liveonearth: (moon)
Listening to the media reports about Trump and Clinton, I understand the frustration of the majority of voters.  Most of us know that the "establishment" politicians, like Clinton, are part and parcel with the corporatocracy that has made our two party system a joke.  The two parties are simply different faces of the same government which is beholden to big business and rich investors.  While the Democrats make more of an effort to care for the most impoverished, neither side is actually effective at reducing poverty.  The Republicans assert that the poor are not helped by a free ride, and this may be true.  It is true that during the Great Depression here in the US, people got healthier.

Trump, on the other hand, is not part of the "establishment" except in so far as he is rich, and he is stupid enough to become their tool, just as Shrub did.  His daily empty statements, like what I just heard that he "will win" 95% of the black American vote, are lunacy.  There is no way that he is getting 95% of any vote, except perhaps of those white male voters who are angry and desperate enough to commit suicide but would rather have someone else do it for them.  I understand the line of thought that says "crash this train", that is to say, destroying our corporatocracy is the first step toward building something new.  This is more the approach of libertarians who understand that big business will not be dethroned by small measures.  Electing Trump would be a drastic measure that could crash this train, except for the fact that the corporate Republican powers will feed his ego and narcissism and keep him busy and distracted by giving him televised glory while they run things.  In other words, it won't work.  Electing Trump will not derail the corporate train.

The Libertarian and Green candidates are relatively attractive in this election.  Unfortunately the Libertarians appear to be almost as "estalishment" as Clinton, see Gary Johnson's positions here.  Jill Stein of the Green party is a physician and one smart cookie, and she actually makes the most sense to me of any of the candidates.  She knows that our two-party system is broken, and she addresses that question and others with a raft of information instead of party lines or defund-it-all ideology.

I do not know what it would take to persuade a majority of voters to choose third-party candidates, but I pray that I live to see it.  At this moment it appears to me that Clinton will win because so many people are terrified of the specter of a Trump presidency.  His racism, bogus claims and impetuous thin-skinned personality are enough to disqualify him for all but the most blindered of voters.  It is true that if he were elected the Republican party would attempt to control him, but we all know that he would be more likely to push the nuclear button than any other president in living memory.  While it bears discussing why we refrain from using nukes, just as it bears discussing why we can't as a society afford freeloaders, we might want to discuss it very well before we hand any control to a tool such as Trump.

I am sure I've mentioned it before, but it is my belief that in order to build a majority that can beat both established parties, we need to build a bridge between the far right Libertarians and the far left Greens.  When this happens we might actually wrest our democracy back from its service to business.  It would be heralded as a great crisis, just like the Brexit vote, but don't believe everything you hear in the news.  A reduction in our GDP might be good for us.  More unemployment is not an entirely bad thing.  We Americans need to get back to the project of taking good care of ourselves and our dear ones, building community, and being real people face to face with other real people.  This wealthy life of internet and automobiles has created a Great Satan that is making us sad.

** first use of tag: green party
liveonearth: (moon)
If you don't want the culture clock turned back to the 50's, you better muster the guts to get registered and turn out to cast your ballot.  Else the progress we've made in terms of tolerance and social justice will be undone, by Rump and his old white guy fans.  You may not like Hillary much better, but that doesn't matter.  Vote.  Vote for anybody.  Vote for a third party.  Vote for someone you actually agree with.  Vote for Hillary to be sure Rump doesn't get in.  Vote against destruction, because a Trump presidency will not only finish off the Republican party, but it will also devastate the American Dream.  Be a part of the process and keep the old white guys from making you irrelevant and thoughtlessly destroying any good relations we have with other nations.
liveonearth: (business dance)

What's distinctive about Sanders is not (or not simply) that he's an ideological purist who refuses to think pragmatically but that he just doesn't know or care very much about the details of how the world works, how to affect concrete change, and what the possible unintended consequences of major changes is likely to be. He'd rather rally the troops and give a rousing speech.
--Damon Linker in the Week, here:
http://theweek.com/articles/617065/bernie-sanders-hollow-aspirational-politics

I share this quote because I disagree.  I think that Bernie sees the writing on the wall, that this crash will either happen sooner and in an intentional way, or later in an even more devastating way.  Take apart the banks, or watch them take us apart.  Re-establish human decency or take care of just yourself.  This crossroads leads one way, the other way is inconceivable.  You just can't change directions when there is so much momentum.  Not without a crash.  Bernie knows that many people will die in the process, that poor people will loose the game, and that over generations rich people will be able to relocate to wherever they need to go to survive and propagate.  Idiocracy will come to pass if tRump is any indication of wealthy breeding.

I thought since the beginning that this polarity between tRump and Bernie is representative of the deepest cultural fissure in this nation.  It has been fascinating to watch it play out.

To assert that Bernie doesn't know how the world works is a pretty low blow.  He knows.  His heart broke a long time ago.  Now he's trying to do something to change it.  I appreciate his efforts and I wish that he'd team up with my old buddy Ron Paul (he's not too old) and connect the political circle.  If anybody knows what's going on, it's these old dudes.

liveonearth: (moon)
I'm not talking about the ignorant rebels who've been co-opted by corporate Republican interests and convinced to vote against their own best interests.  I'm talking about those Tea Party thinkers who know that our government is run by and for big business (not "the people"), and would like to do something about it.

This is what I've been talking about.  The possibility that the left wing and the right wing could reach around the back of the government bird and strangle the business creature that is riding on its back.

*first use of tag: Bernie
liveonearth: (TommyLeeJones_skeptical)

Even if

every gun in the world

suddenly disappeared,

there would still be gun violence

--Ben Carson, retired neurosurgeon and Republican candidate for president

liveonearth: (moon)
For example, a cursory scan of the TV and internet news continues to tell me today that Carson is winning hearts and minds, that he is the most popular Republican candidate for president.  The one who keeps impressing me is Rubio, not because he's spotless, but because he is taking the high road and sounding sharp while he's on it.  My partner finds him frightening, considers him to be the most dangerous of the lot because he has a chance of winning.  I don't know what to think of him and wish the media would focus on Rubio, Paul, etc more and less on tRump and cARSon.  Oh well, I don't care about it enough to really study on it, just impressions here.
liveonearth: (dancer romani)
According to the Oregonian yesterday, there are 15 million illegal Mexicans in the US today. The announcement today is that Obama will issue work permits to some 800,000 young illegals instead of deporting them. The older folks are still getting deported, but the young will be... assimilated? Perhaps. Once they have a work permit, and they can be in this country under the light of day, they may decide they want to stay and seek citizenship.

ruminations )
liveonearth: (Default)
Vote for the man who promises least;
he'll be the least disappointing.

--Bernard Barush, Biznessman
liveonearth: (endless_knot)
Nobody expects him to win. Not even him. It would be quite a shock, after this many attempts. Ron Paul realizes that he's not really campaigning for himself to be president, but rather for an alternative view of how government works and what it should do. For a movement, and a revolution. For an alternative view of how society works, and what it means to be human. I am thrilled for him because he got the youth vote in Iowa today. The new voters came out for him. Probably because of that Big Dog ad, in combination with Dr Paul's willingness to legalize pot. Strange bedfellows indeed. Societies shift according to the ley lines of the culture.

It's pretty amusing to hear the rest of the candidates talk mainly about defeating Barack Obama. I would and will vote against all of them in favor of Barack Obama. Newt makes me wish desperately for a moral atheist candidate. The others I can't even remember. I wish for Palin. She'd at least make big enough gaffes to make me spit out my food.

Don't worry, I'll turn off the radio, soon. I have to say I really do enjoy hearing the candidates speaking to their own people at these events. I learn a lot more than I do from statements that have been honed for the mainstream news.

QUOTE OF THE DAY
We're all Austrians now.
--Ron Paul

(Austrians = opposite of Keynesians. This quote of course taken radically out of context, he is speaking of some time in the future when Keynesian economics is no longer broadly accepted and applied in America.)
liveonearth: (Default)

This ad makes light of gigantic changes--but presents them as something that CAN be done, which is why it will really shake things up. Because the bottom line is that the rest of them won't even TALK about such tremendous change. It's too frightening. By making an ad that is cartoonish and humorous, the RP campaign is re-introducing ideas that have been taboo up to now, and still are taboo to a large segment of the population. But that segment is embattled, and it takes outrageousness to cause a sea change. I remain fascinated and impressed with the man, in spite of his age and the media's disrespect. This will be his last presidential attempt, I believe.
liveonearth: (Spidey: come into my parlour)
...Maybe he shouldn't be such a fine upstanding citizen. Or maybe we should just start accusing him of ridiculous stuff. Scandals are great for getting media exposure. Our buddy Dr Paul is so consistent and ethical and reasonable that he's... boring. I think boring would be a great improvement over the tooth gritting drama that is currently our political reality. I wish people wouldn't write him off so quickly based on dismissive (and often false) propaganda. The media machine manipulates the mass mind too easily.
liveonearth: (the call of cthulhu)
And I disagreed with him then. He was spouting off then about how there should not be a religious litmus test for presidents. My response: I will not vote for anyone who takes on "faith" things that are insane to me. It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with common sense. I also won't automatically do whatever somebody says I "should", being fundamentally skeptical and rebellious (like a good American). Romney doesn't rate a tag. I sure hope he never gets elected president, and he's the only intelligent one out of the whole pack of media-covered Republican candidates. Wish the media would cover Ron Paul... well I guess they do, just not as much as I would like. He just took in over $3 million buckaroos in small donations in the last 5 days. So I guess I'm not the only fan.
liveonearth: (Default)
I didn't know she was this bad.... but apparently the social conservatives really like her.
liveonearth: (endless_knot)
Today is the Ron Paul campaign-starting Money Bomb. I already contributed. Even though many people do not take him seriously, any opportunity to get his ideas better represented in the public discourse is beneficial to the Republic. I ride the line between left and right. If the two ever should meet we would have a new middle position, different from the existing one that has sold out.

Here's where you too can give $20.12 or more to keep the debate going:
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

ruminations )
liveonearth: (Default)
Have you got your vote sorted out for Nov 2?
I'm voting for Kitzhaber but beyond that I have some work to do.
some places you could start, esp for Oregon voters )

Profile

liveonearth: (Default)
liveonearth

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 5th, 2025 04:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios