![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Gavin's words made me chuckle:
"Assassinating terrorists on foreign soil is no more legal than a hunter shooting varmints in his neighbor's back yard. Just as it is no more right for American leaders to make blatant threats than for "rogue" nations to do so. By our own logic, Cuba and Venezuela have every right to fire missiles into Miami to eradicate the killers we harbor here."
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 02:24 am (UTC)I was using Obama as simply an example. The problem isn't really him, or the neoconservatives... it's something about the way America itself thinks. No mainstream politician would question our "right" to attack, nor would any mainstream journalist. Even those who took issue with Obama weren't so concerned about the fact he suggested invasion, but the fact he was so vocal about it.
(I know you know this, but I'm clarifying for any reader. Hillary or Biden or who-knows-who-else would be just as likely to act in this way. Your favorite, Ron Paul, I think might be one of the very few exceptions.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 03:11 am (UTC)Ron Paul is definitely an exception to this bullying status quo among US politicians. He has said that his first order as president would be for the aircraft carriers to back away from Iran. He understands blowback and is willing to speak about it.