Having only read your text, I do say that this is indeed interesting. In the past, I was rather cavalier towards the possibility of even the smallest degree of efficacy of homeopathy. But I have become far more open-minded.
Of course, the skeptic would object that perhaps a stats fluke, chance, or added ingredients may be source of what seems like some influence from homeopathics.
But, the madness of my own poison ivy infections in the past, which were apparently contracted via discrete angel farts from many million of light-years away, make me tend to accept this as probable support to the likelihood of influence, and so possible efficacy, (which would still be dependent on variability of the subject, and so on).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2013-03-16 02:36 am (UTC)Of course, the skeptic would object that perhaps a stats fluke, chance, or added ingredients may be source of what seems like some influence from homeopathics.
But, the madness of my own poison ivy infections in the past, which were apparently contracted via discrete angel farts from many million of light-years away, make me tend to accept this as probable support to the likelihood of influence, and so possible efficacy, (which would still be dependent on variability of the subject, and so on).