liveonearth (
liveonearth) wrote2008-07-28 08:47 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Herb Fest Ruminations: on Believing (or NOT)
The Herb Fest was good. I met some really cool people. I found the ND population to be more cliquish than the rest, so I wandered among the botanists and MD's, herbalists and nutritionists, asking everyone their opinions about the lectures. I got a great many opinions and came to a grasp of what people believe in these days...like for example, I would hazard a guess that maybe half of the people at the herb fest believe in past lives. Maybe more. They believe in reincarnation and that your current life is a product of what you did in past lives. Do you? If you do, I'd love to hear the story. I confess: I'm a skeptic. As I've said before I don't "believe" in reincarnation...though it is widely accepted among the alternative healing community.
When I ended up in ND circles I was curious to find out what people really think about homeopathy. It turns out that budding naturopaths do, by and large, "believe". I have only had one naturopathic student talk to me about NOT believing it. Each believer has a story about the moment that they came to believe. It is generally some amazing cure. The crowd told me to use homeopathy on animals, because they don't have expectations, and that would prove homeopathy for me. It was kind of refreshing to hear one practice ND and speaker say that he doesn't "do" homeopathy. I don't think so far that I will do it either. I am open to being convinced but it will take more than all these lovely tales of someone associating a dramatic change with a dose of something. It reminds me of religious people, looking for a sign. Most of the time you don't look for signs, but anything that happens after a dose is a "sign" that makes you think everything is somehow different.
Don't get me wrong, I do believe in "energy" or qi, because I have had ample personal demonstration of it. And I don't doubt that many people have amazing shifts in qi from taking in a few drops of a strange dilute substance. But all these stories don't constitute PROOF of causality in my mind. Association is enough for it to become widely practiced and accepted, which then culturally generates a willingness to believe. I won't believe it is anything but placebo effect until there is some science backing it up. So far those research papers have not been showing up in my life. And so far, I can't tell that all these homeopathics that I am taking are doing anything.
I am the test pony. I am currently taking UNDA numbers 1, 5, 228: 5 drops under the tongue 3 times a day and keep them in order from smallest to largest number. This little ritual has no meaning for me. I need more of a suggestion as to what it might do. If they were to tell me what it would do, and then I would have that happen to me after the fact, that would increase my willingness to believe.
At my school I am required to take 5 quarter-long courses in homeopathy. Being an unbeliever as I am, I will keep my mouth shut. I hope that I am convinced, because if the evidence isn't there, and it is purely a process of indoctrination, I will not just pretend that I believe. I'm resistant to brainwashing. I have to be convinced.
Back to the Herb Fest, there was a range of belief regarding diet. There were the vegetarians, who were still fighting for the rightness of their way. The more they shouted out about the science supporting their claim that a vegetarian diet is right for humans, the less anyone paid attention to them. There was a showdown during a class on insulin resistance, in which the speaker, who was suggesting that a meat-heavy low-carb diet is fine for people who are insulin resistant, was confronted by a few vegetarians who wanted to fight the good fight of proving you can be healthy on vegetables alone. Vegetarians consider BEANS to be a protein, whereas low carb eaters call them a carb. There is a new population of people who used to be avid vegetarians who are now avid meat eaters because they became convinced that it was the healthy thing to do. They can argue "both sides". It was an entertaining spectacle.
The food, unfortunately, was entirely vegetarian and lacking in the proteins that I have been instructed to eat at every single meal. I do not have to eat a LOT of meat, but I do need to eat at least some nuts or cheese with every meal. At this retreat I was taking more than my share of sesame seeds and goat cheese from the salad condiments, trying to get my proteins and fats. They ran out of hardboiled eggs in the morning so I ate a lot of yogurt, because everything else on offer was pure carb. It was good, mind you, with lots of fresh blueberries which everybody loves.
The lectures were all over the place, from hard science (neurotransmitters) to clinical (pain management) to woo woo. There were a lot of references to Chinese herbs and to the system of herbs being warming, cooling, drying, etc. There were also classes on pulse and tongue diagnosis, which I did not attend. I am an unbeliever there too. I am interested in medicines that have been around for thousands of years AND we know something about how they work. It's just my Western mind, being obstinant, I know.
When I ended up in ND circles I was curious to find out what people really think about homeopathy. It turns out that budding naturopaths do, by and large, "believe". I have only had one naturopathic student talk to me about NOT believing it. Each believer has a story about the moment that they came to believe. It is generally some amazing cure. The crowd told me to use homeopathy on animals, because they don't have expectations, and that would prove homeopathy for me. It was kind of refreshing to hear one practice ND and speaker say that he doesn't "do" homeopathy. I don't think so far that I will do it either. I am open to being convinced but it will take more than all these lovely tales of someone associating a dramatic change with a dose of something. It reminds me of religious people, looking for a sign. Most of the time you don't look for signs, but anything that happens after a dose is a "sign" that makes you think everything is somehow different.
Don't get me wrong, I do believe in "energy" or qi, because I have had ample personal demonstration of it. And I don't doubt that many people have amazing shifts in qi from taking in a few drops of a strange dilute substance. But all these stories don't constitute PROOF of causality in my mind. Association is enough for it to become widely practiced and accepted, which then culturally generates a willingness to believe. I won't believe it is anything but placebo effect until there is some science backing it up. So far those research papers have not been showing up in my life. And so far, I can't tell that all these homeopathics that I am taking are doing anything.
I am the test pony. I am currently taking UNDA numbers 1, 5, 228: 5 drops under the tongue 3 times a day and keep them in order from smallest to largest number. This little ritual has no meaning for me. I need more of a suggestion as to what it might do. If they were to tell me what it would do, and then I would have that happen to me after the fact, that would increase my willingness to believe.
At my school I am required to take 5 quarter-long courses in homeopathy. Being an unbeliever as I am, I will keep my mouth shut. I hope that I am convinced, because if the evidence isn't there, and it is purely a process of indoctrination, I will not just pretend that I believe. I'm resistant to brainwashing. I have to be convinced.
Back to the Herb Fest, there was a range of belief regarding diet. There were the vegetarians, who were still fighting for the rightness of their way. The more they shouted out about the science supporting their claim that a vegetarian diet is right for humans, the less anyone paid attention to them. There was a showdown during a class on insulin resistance, in which the speaker, who was suggesting that a meat-heavy low-carb diet is fine for people who are insulin resistant, was confronted by a few vegetarians who wanted to fight the good fight of proving you can be healthy on vegetables alone. Vegetarians consider BEANS to be a protein, whereas low carb eaters call them a carb. There is a new population of people who used to be avid vegetarians who are now avid meat eaters because they became convinced that it was the healthy thing to do. They can argue "both sides". It was an entertaining spectacle.
The food, unfortunately, was entirely vegetarian and lacking in the proteins that I have been instructed to eat at every single meal. I do not have to eat a LOT of meat, but I do need to eat at least some nuts or cheese with every meal. At this retreat I was taking more than my share of sesame seeds and goat cheese from the salad condiments, trying to get my proteins and fats. They ran out of hardboiled eggs in the morning so I ate a lot of yogurt, because everything else on offer was pure carb. It was good, mind you, with lots of fresh blueberries which everybody loves.
The lectures were all over the place, from hard science (neurotransmitters) to clinical (pain management) to woo woo. There were a lot of references to Chinese herbs and to the system of herbs being warming, cooling, drying, etc. There were also classes on pulse and tongue diagnosis, which I did not attend. I am an unbeliever there too. I am interested in medicines that have been around for thousands of years AND we know something about how they work. It's just my Western mind, being obstinant, I know.
no subject
Why do you need to eat so much protein? I've heard that any more protein than a few almonds a day is extraneous unless you're a bodybuilder.
no subject
Does your mother grow herbs or use them? It sounds like you don't believe in reincarnation. Is that true? Do you believe in something?
no subject
I think whether reincarnation is true or not is irrelevant to me. Because we lose most/all of our memories in it anyway, it wouldn't matter to me if it were true.
I don't think it's true because I'm not a dualist -- i.e. I believe you can't separate the material realm from the experiential realm: every thought, feeling, memory, etc. has a corresponding physical element, so I can't imagine a mechanism which would transfer a person between bodies without also transferring something physical to hold the information.
It's possible the transfer works through some unknown physical method of course -- such as electromagnetism or something undetectable to the senses. But I doubt there's a hidden physical mechanism for another reason: unless we assume the "souls" are reproducible, i.e. that anyone born must have a soul and that it must have come from some previous life -- that would mean that the number of souls in existence would have to remain constant, which is contrary to what we know about the human population (which has increased over our history) or the earth's population if we allow transfer between species (which has also increased over the earth's history).
We could also allow interplanetary reincarnation, as the Scientologists believe, but that still requires either a steady-state universe where the number of lives living in the universe is constant, with no increase or decrease in that number (which is contrary to what cosmology we know) -- or a nearly limitless number of free souls with sometimes long delays between incarnations, or soul generation and destruction of some sort (perhaps souls could be converted into matter or energy under extreme conditions, the way matter and energy are interconvertable under extreme conditions)
Another reason I doubt it is that I can't imagine any use for it. Why would the universe or life require a reincarnative mechanism? What's the benefit of it? If we imagine two alternate universes, one with reincarnation and one without, would life in the one with it have any type of advantage that would allow them to evolve it? If not, then it's something that didn't evolve from life, but was either introduced by some external agent outside of the universe, or arose from the nature of the laws of the universe. I find the idea that reincarnation could evolve with life as an advantageous trait interesting, and more conceivable than the idea that consciousness or experience is somehow special or built-in to the laws of the universe.
But as I said, if it's true, I don't really think it matters. It'd be interesting in the abstract sense, but not something that matter one way or the other -- i.e. it won't change the way I live or think or how I act.
I think a lot of people believe in reincarnation because they use it as a rationalization to explain why they have problems in life, believing it's their karma left over from their last life. Or they just believe in it because they don't like the idea that they or others will be gone forever -- which would be true even if reincarnation is true in any case, because most of their memories and personality are gone forever either way.
Or they sometimes use it like the Christians use hell, as a belief that they'll be rewarded in the next life and the others who don't act the way they like will be punished by being born as a lesser animal (this is a common belief among Hindus for example, and oddly mirrors how Christians use the idea of heaven and hell).
no subject
no subject
I'm still curious about research. Maybe I should jump in second year.
no subject
Cool finding in the research! I am not surprised that an animal can have placebo effect. Animals thrive on attention and contact, and a new kind of attention and contact, loaded with psychic energy, could have a strong impact on them.
no subject
My only knowledge of herbs comes from my experiences practicing Magick as a (former) Wiccan and (dilettante) Thelemite. These days I suspect they have more value as nutritional supplements than they do as mojo or juju, but that has to do with my predisposition to mysticism dismissing externalities as part of the illusion of Maya rather than saying such illusions are meaningless.
Truth be told, I'm more inclined these days to living my everyday life than pondering the imponderable.
no subject
What's a Thelemite?
I just can't stop pondering...tis my nature.
no subject
perspectives....
Me...it's whatever works. We all, individually, are a sum of our experiences. The ongoing yin and yang of nature versus nurture. That frames our perspectives.
So, if another feels differently, then so be it. Dogmatic thought tends to be overbearing and tedious. Leaves no room for growth and makes people just like what they say they aren't.
hmmmmm...(in the southern non-commital way of saying)..."What about that?"....
beau
Re: perspectives....
Re: perspectives....
I think that is why I get so pissed at the judgemental Christians who want to "save me" from their perceived form of eternal damnation.
I find it interesting how the native Americans concept of a medicine wheel, or continuum, works well for me. It allows for change. It allows for stagnation. It allows for all, and still works. Pretty cool.
Weather channel says it is nice out in the PNW. The Carolinas are still dry, but good for photosynthesis. re: sunny...
Love ya,
J.
Re: perspectives....
Suz arrived yesterday and it started raining today. I guess to welcome her back. All is well here. I have a suntan on parts that have never ever had a tan before. =-]
no subject
no subject