liveonearth: (Default)
liveonearth ([personal profile] liveonearth) wrote2010-12-09 11:04 am

Mercola's argument that cancer is "man-made"

The *mummys didn't have cancer* argument is only part of it. Scroll down to the comments to see his breakdown of how we give ourselves cancer.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/12/03/cancer-not-found-in-ancient-mummies-appears-to-be-recent-disease.aspx

[identity profile] bodylove.livejournal.com 2010-12-09 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
that article doesn't make sense...the human life expectancy averaged around 30 yrs for ages...it's only recently that people are living long enough to develop different types of cancers...

[identity profile] liveonearth.livejournal.com 2010-12-09 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes...the mummy argument is weak, I agree. He jumps from his attention-getting point to his anti-cancer protocols which are backed by science. If all that science is taken in, the conclusion that we set the scene for cancer development is difficult to avoid. But it's still not "proven".

[identity profile] bodylove.livejournal.com 2010-12-09 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah the part about good nutrition and vitamin D etc is useful....but the mummy thing made me not want to read more!